New Pope
A german conservative is the Roman Catholic Church's new Pope (human representation of that organization's deity on planet Earth).
Now, if for one, I applaud the church's decision not to suck politically correct dick (the much hyped possibility of a new pope to be of african, south-american or asian ethnicity). Well, the new pope belongs to an ethnicity that does not represent the reasons why others were talked about (diversity or affirmative action, if you will). My concern is not whether the man is german, my concern is that he is a conservative, and, no matter how much JP the IInd influenced the crumbling of the Iron Curtain in his day, the church faces a lot different challenges today. These challenges would be better met by someone who knows personally the tragedy of Africa's constant losing war on disease, famine and ignorance; or the tragedy of South america's intolerance and corruption; or Asia's overpopulation, poverty and STD problems. Someone who knows first-hand the need to change the mind of the church and its followers about the importance and need of: -Tolerance and respect. -Sustainable development. -Birth Control. -Child-planning and care to populations. Enough to get you going? |
I feel similarly to you, Mael. An uber-conservative isn't going to be a good mediator in inter-faith dialogue, or dialogue amongst Christians. He's not going to help the church change with the world, more likely he'll put the church *against* the world. Not what we need.
I know Pope Benedict left "Hitler's Youth" in 1945, but the fact that he belonged to such a group says something about Pope Benedict's person. He dismisses same-sex couples as "deviant and evil", which won't help with the dialogue between gays and straights... as if this is much of a change, but seriously- we could have hoped for a little bit more than an ex-Nazi. Another interesting tidbit about the new Pope- he was nick-named "God's Rottweiler". Quote:
Someone who's already stating such strong, aggressive possitions on the main issues that the Catholic Church needs to have discussion on... it's not a good start. It's one thing to have an opinion, it's quite another to condemn those who you should have dialogue with. Right now, we need a pope who will listen, who will understand... I'm not asking for a liberal pope, because I know that's impossible, but maybe just a guy who doesn't walk in, first day on the job, and say "You are all DEMONS....but I'm open to dialogue." He's Catholic, it's pretty much given he's not pro-Protestants/Gays, etc. He doesn't need to condemn them immediately, especially when most newspapers are reporting that his major goals are "the promotion of the unity of Christians and a commitment to ecumenism, the continued dialogue with other religions and the fulfillment of the reforms of the Second Vatican Council." (from the New York Times). Disclaimer: Before any of you dismiss me as the anti-Christ, I'll have you know I was a Sunday School teacher at a Presbyterian Church, and after work I went directly to Catholic Mass, which was held in the same church. I know my theology, and I know where I stand on religion. I'm not baptized, I never took the eucharist, but I have a deep respect for religion and its implications to my life, to everybody's life, to the world. |
It's just bad news.
Why did JP II have to die and leave everything in the hands of someone like this Ratzinger? I haven't given up my pagan ways, but I was sad when I heard the new Pope's pronouncements on being elected.Plus I don't like the look in his eyes.But that's just me.JP never looked shifty like he does. This new guy's going to be nothing but trouble.I see him breeding nothing but dis-unity and dis-harmony in the future. |
My mate emailed me and told me at first how confused and excited he was that John Ratzberger was now the pope! Then he saw it wasn't John after all, and alas was depressed.
But wouldn't Cliff make a good Pope? To early to tell what this guy will do. Ye never know... Slán |
Re: New Pope
Quote:
So South American women will remain doomed with one of the highest birth rate in the world, and one of the highest mortality rate's for women 35 and under, until this guy wheezes his last breath.. That has been my big problem with the Vatican, they have been so anti-birth control, and anti-family planning for so many years, which doesn't seem all that bad on the surface.. But when you look at Honduras and Guatemala, you see the problem.. These families are suffering terribly, with children they cant afford to care for, let alone feed. All because the Vatican says Birth Control is evil. My surgeon volunteers 2 months in Guatemala every year with a team of doctors, and the stories she has told me are so horrendous. Women walking three days just to see them for care, with prolapsed uteruses hanging down their legs, from bearing so many children. They give birth again and again and again until their bodies give out, and then they die... It's fucking criminal, and the Vatican just turns a blind eye to it all.. Yeah, gee that must be God's master plan.. Its fucking brilliant though, because the people believe they risk eternal damnation by defying God and using birth control to prevent unwanted pregnancies.. Control by intimidation. Ring any bells? Makes me ill.. And now with Ratzinger, things in my opinion will only get worse, not better.. And who suffers? Millions of good people and their children, all because of someone outdated religious edict that has no place in todays world, in my opinion. Argh, I'll get off my soapbox, it is just so disheartening to stand by and watch, like so many other things.. Makes me feel oh so much better as well knowing that Ratzinger was a member of Hitler's youth. Whee=Not so much :x :cry: |
Like the lads are saying down at the shop - get three more coffins ready!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's basically the same thing. If you were a teenager in Germany during the early '40s, you were more-or-less automatically in the Hitler Youth, whether you liked it or not. |
Quote:
You're right- he's not a Nazi. Quote:
However, from the same link: Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Buddhists are cool, though. But I don't see much being accomplished by an inter-faith dialogue between Buddhists and the Vatican. As I said, the "inter-faith talks" line is to the Papacy the equivalent of our American "I will improve education." A few half-handed attempts will be made, then it's on to business as usual. |
Asurai-considering that every pope since Blessed John XXIII has had inter-faith communication of all kinds with religious heads of all stripes, and said heads have had no qualms about coming to the table or discussing/debating differences and similarities, and both sides have walked away at peace with each other, your statement suggesting that something like this could never happen seems a bit....well, absurd.
....as far as the new pope thing is concerned, all I can think is "wow....another religious head I won't pay attention to". I mean, c'mon people, how many of you are A-catholic, B-PRACTICING catholic, and C-actually affected by this guys stance on these things? I mean, yeah, it would have been nice to have another Blessed John XXIII (who, by the way, pissed off a lot of the church during his papacy by trying to find a common ground between church dogma and modern life.....something to point out whenever people pull the "popes don't wanna modernise the church), but catholics have this guy....ho hum. |
Well, I don't know this new pope personally, so I can speak only on what I've heard, which is not usually advisable. So, I'll simply say that I'll judge tihs new pope by his actions.
I'm not Catholic; hell, I'm very much pagan, but I did respect JP jr., simply because he carried himself as a man of honor. He believed what he believed, and didn't profess to something simply because it was in his best interests in obtaining more power and influence in the church. He seemed to genuinely care about people, and I do pray that Benedict XVI is a man of similar convictions and compassion - especially in reaching out to others and trying to work with those of different faiths. And he looks like a nice enough old man...but...book covers don't tell much of anything, do they? And most of them today promise more than the text delivers. Anyway, in pace requiescas, Johannem Paulum II. Damn, no more posting after a few snifters of brandy...good brany though. |
Quote:
If he teaches that gays are evil or demonic, that affects the members of the gay community, re:gay-bashing is okay cuz the pope says they're evil/demonic. If he tells people that catholicism is the only righteous path that will have an affect on those of us not catholic in some way or another. I'm reminded of a metaphor about a moth's wings on one side of the world creating a tornado or something on the other side. :? |
The new pope just doesn't seem to have the same sense of humanity about him that John Paul had. I know he had issues with gay people (with which I don't agree), but I think it was a major step to actually say that being predudiced against Jewish people is a sin. I don't really know about what I think of the new pope yet...
|
My mom thinks he looks kind of wierd.
|
|
I'm Pope Offensive Randy XI. Heh..
And I agree with Jane whole-heartedly. Well said. |
Pope Hideous Doug X
:lol: |
i'm pope vicious ralph the 8th.
and it's funny to me, in a curious way, how much furor has arisen over catholics electing a catholic pope. |
This sort of thing always happens to me in these name-genorators.....
Pope Facetious Dick II . Also, I think the new pope looks a little like "Rotwang; The Invemtor" from "Metropolis". Maybe I'm nuts. http://oomu.org/documents/images/metropolis/rotwang.jpg |
I'm Pope Atrocious Phil IX!
and I decree that drooling on forums is a sin! :P |
Quote:
|
To quote your signature, Pope Vicious Ralph the 8th, "Not every thirst should be slaked"
:twisted: |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:36 PM. |