Quote:
|
Originally Posted by binkie
Yes, I'm the only one trying to debunk them... in the world. Leading industry engineers never lifted a finger to take part in any comprehensive report, no commentators have said anything to counter the 'theories,' and the media certainly buy this stuff, as obvious by the fact CNN runs articles (this one dated 2005) with lines like, "The father of one of the hijackers who commandeered the first plane that crashed into the World Trade Center on September 11," describing Atta, one of the hijackers that theorists belive is "still alive" (yet lack any photographic evidence of such a claim). I have yet to see any article from the Associated Press deviate from reporting that anyone other than the 19 hijackers carried out the 9/11 attacks, or that anything other than a plane hit the Pentagon.
|
Well here you go then - links to major news agencies, with photographic evidence and quotes from the FBI.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/1559151.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...23/widen23.xml
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...0/wterr120.xml
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/13/america.attack/
Look at the correction on the cnn article above. It states the FBI questioned at least two of the listed hijackers, who now are known to be alive, well, and living in Florida (well at the time).
CORRECTION
We would like to correct a report that appeared on CNN. Based on information from multiple law enforcement sources, CNN reported that Adnan Bukhari and Ameer Bukhari of Vero Beach Florida, were suspected to be two of the pilots who crashed planes into the World Trade Center. CNN later learned that Adnan Bukhari is still in Florida, where he was questioned by the FBI. We are sorry for the misinformation. A federal law enforcement source now tells CNN that Bukhari passed an FBI polygraph and is not considered a suspect. Through his attorney, Bukhari says that he is helping authorities. Ameer Bukhari died in a small plane crash last year.
So are you arguing with all those news sources AND the FBI now? The FBI admits it had the wrong men, but yet no one is out there clearing their names - other than CNN listing a few small corrections on the last page. A few European news agencies as listed above have MET these men, in person, same as in the pictures.
So you just going to say thats all just some scam as well? How do you explain away those articles?
And, yes, I may be self plugging, but thats because I have nothing to hide and my life is out there with my credentials. You however, make numerous claims, and still never back any up. And please, show us some indpendent sites that back you up? And show us why exact it is you think you know more than various news agencies? Like bush, just because you keep saying it doesn't make it true. I can scan back through this thread alone to see link after link to government sites, numerous un-cited claims, but little actual content from you on any argument.
Realise your never 'debating' me, you are debating the facts as presented by the news. Tis why I think its so funny. I post an article, like the one on the ports, that says, in plain writing one thing, then you always aruge that the article is wrong, or more to the point I'm wrong, and that I am making it up.
I merely quote news articles. You are debating with the AP, Reuters, etc. I find it hard to think you have ever 'beaten' them on any agrument either, even though you profess once again to have on 'many' occassions?
But hey, at least I got my laugh for the day!