|
OK. I get that you wanted to point at an example, I just think those particular labels are either off the mark, or are significantly diluting the impact they should carry when you apply them in a haphazard fashion.
Of course free speech is a protection for objectionable material - there's no need to 'protect' things that aren't controversial or potentially offensive.
Learning to cope with being offended is just part of life. It's immature to expect the rest of the world to filter uncomfortable or distasteful experiences for your personal comfort.
|