Quote:
Originally Posted by Awake Knights
Sorry yes, I misread the post. Stand corrected.
Now here is where I said it's important to define terms.
When someone used to talk about a racist, a racist was a person who wants to "kill all the (not my colour) people." However, if I say forced integration is a disaster for everyone involved, that, to some, qualifies me as an evil racist. Or if I say that in the past FIVE years 100% of the rapes (where the rapist could be identified) committed in Norway were non-white on white and that I think it's bad and don't want that to happen, that makes me a racist. That said, I don't automatically hate someone for the colour of their skin. So it's up to you to decide.
|
If you automatically assume that because there's a difference of colour, there's an integration problem, that makes you racist. If you're willing to believe that statistic, from which the original story said that 100% of the rapes in OSLO, not NORWAY, came from a supposed COMMEDIAN and has since been spread around by racists as the gospel truth, then there's a very good chance you're a racist.
What I don't get about the anti-integration crap is how you define race. If someone is half black, do you think he shouldn't have been born? Who is he supposed to be grouped with?