Gothic.net Community
Page 37 of 62 « First 27 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 47 Last »
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

Gothic.net Community (https://www.gothic.net/boards/index.php)
-   General (https://www.gothic.net/boards/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Eternal life. (https://www.gothic.net/boards/showthread.php?t=25788)

Miss Absynthe 11-06-2012 07:28 PM
Well.. I suppose that I could be won over with chocolate..

pothead 11-06-2012 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Absynthe (Post 703181)
Well.. I suppose that I could be won over with chocolate..
white chocolate ?

Miss Absynthe 11-06-2012 10:43 PM
Yes.. I could be won over with white chocolate.

Timeless Rebellion 11-06-2012 10:59 PM
Tell you what, Miss A! When we finally meet some day, I will bring you a huge novelty box full of chocolate! How does that sound? :D

hui09 11-07-2012 01:17 AM
I think you'll find the lord and master of this thread will be the forum moderator.Replica Hermes,Prada,Louis Vuitton Store

pothead 11-07-2012 02:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hui09 (Post 703205)
I think you'll find the lord and master of this thread will be the forum moderator.Replica Hermes,Prada,Louis Vuitton Store
why must you try to limit free speech ?

Miss Absynthe 11-07-2012 04:00 AM
Timeless, that sounds like I might love you forever. :D

Timeless Rebellion 11-07-2012 07:20 AM
Miss A: It's a deal ;)

pothead 11-07-2012 02:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Absynthe (Post 703217)
Timeless, that sounds like I might love you forever. :D
so you would love me forever too, if I just got you white chocolate?

Miss Absynthe 11-07-2012 04:21 PM
I may be a slut, but I'm a slut with standards.

pothead 11-07-2012 10:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Absynthe (Post 703264)
I may be a slut, but I'm a slut with standards.
well I'm not hearing a no, so that means yes right ?

Miss Absynthe 11-07-2012 11:05 PM
Does it? Does the lack of an explicit 'no' really mean yes?

Timeless Rebellion 11-07-2012 11:13 PM
So that's how r-apists justify it then?

pothead 11-07-2012 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Absynthe (Post 703282)
Does it? Does the lack of an explicit 'no' really mean yes?
why yes it does

pothead 11-07-2012 11:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timeless Rebellion (Post 703283)
So that's how r-apists justify it then?
it's not a legitimate **** if the person doesn't say no

Miss Absynthe 11-08-2012 05:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pothead (Post 703287)
it's not a legitimate **** if the person doesn't say no
http://i.imgur.com/qv6yy.jpg

Miss Absynthe 11-08-2012 05:05 AM
http://i.imgur.com/fDqDC.jpg

Timeless Rebellion 11-08-2012 07:03 AM
Pothead: That will be decided my a court of law :)

pothead 11-08-2012 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Absynthe (Post 703298)
I think the other person is the victim , so whats wrong with that ?

pothead 11-08-2012 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timeless Rebellion (Post 703307)
Pothead: That will be decided my a court of law :)
the truth will still stand even if it's turned down by the courts

marrissey 11-08-2012 09:54 PM
Is this guy victim blaming now?? Oh fuck no.

pothead 11-09-2012 07:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by marrissey (Post 703350)
Is this guy victim blaming now?? Oh fuck no.
who said I was doing that ?

Miss Absynthe 11-09-2012 11:20 PM
I said that you were doing that.

The assertion that someone has to state and explicit "No" is not only victim-blaming bullshit and rrape-culture (the onus should be on people to gain consent if they want to initiate contact, not on people to withdraw consent after contact is already initiated), but it's legally untrue.

Even if you look at rrape from a purely legal standpoint, the word "no" doesn't have to be spoken to show non-consent.

Timeless Rebellion 11-10-2012 05:11 AM
Pothead just went from religious fanatic to batshit crazy.
Well done Potty!

pothead 11-11-2012 11:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Absynthe (Post 703394)
I said that you were doing that.

The assertion that someone has to state and explicit "No" is not only victim-blaming bullshit and rrape-culture (the onus should be on people to gain consent if they want to initiate contact, not on people to withdraw consent after contact is already initiated), but it's legally untrue.

Even if you look at rrape from a purely legal standpoint, the word "no" doesn't have to be spoken to show non-consent.
no it wasn't you who said I was victim blaming, it was some duck that said it , and a illegitimate rrape is like what you did and withdrew consent during a act was already initiated ..lol..and a no don't have to be said if you unconscious, but if your fully aware and no retarded it has to be said in most cases. thats why they tell you to just say no


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:13 AM.
Page 37 of 62 « First 27 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 47 Last »
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page