Gothic.net Community

Gothic.net Community (https://www.gothic.net/boards/index.php)
-   Politics (https://www.gothic.net/boards/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Pro-Gun Anti-Gun. (https://www.gothic.net/boards/showthread.php?t=13864)

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian (Post 546005)
How about the fact that you keep talking about Truth and how I, a perfect example of the person that will disagree with you to the point of not respecting you, is not simply a dick, but a person that is actually 'in the mist.'
To any sensible person it clearly shows that you fucking believe there's a concrete answer, and you have it, and people that don't listen to your Truth are against you.
This is also my argument with your bullshit idea that there actually IS an elite group trying to murder us (and as I mentioned you are one of the selected few who know this Truth) which completely cops out the system and places the blame on some literally evil people that just like suffering. Once again, what you're saying is OH NO THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THE SYSTEM, IT'S JUST THE PEOPLE RUNNING IT, but it wouldn't be this bad and the selected few wouldn't want to kill half of the world if they weren't there; if maybe instead they were replaced by the selected few that, like you, know the Truth, huh?
You might have seen how I actually answered your questions before you asked them, but you were too quick to say "ah! I can attempt another unbased insult because this looks like projection! Fuck the argument, I'll attack the persona again. Your move Alan!"

So in others words Jillian you disagree with everything the Constitution stands for?

And by extension you have no problem with Robbery,R*pings,Murders,Home invasions,Kidnappings,or Child Molestation ?

Godslayer Jillian 06-29-2009 12:42 AM

Once again, you have proven yourself to be a fucking idiot.

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 12:46 AM

I was only asking Questions Jill.

Not assigning any guilt,only questioning your stance on the subject?

Godslayer Jillian 06-29-2009 12:53 AM

Bullshit. Hey deadman, are you against the government of America? Are you therefore against America and everything which the government of America stands? Then you are in favor of gay bashing, ****** teenagers, killing black people, eating babies, and murdering people for fun?

Yeah, that's totally an argument. Respond!! I'm only questioning you. You're your own individual FOX News. "I'm not implying anything, but if you let me ask you why are you against freedom?"


Fucking idiot.

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian (Post 546016)
Bullshit. Hey deadman, are you against the government of America? Are you therefore against America and everything which the government of America stands? Then you are in favor of gay bashing, ****** teenagers, killing black people, eating babies, and murdering people for fun?

Yeah, that's totally an argument. Respond!! I'm only questioning you. You're your own individual FOX News. "I'm not implying anything, but if you let me ask you why are you against freedom?"


Fucking idiot.

I'm not against the Government just the thieves that have taken it over,and the perversion it has become.

I don't have a problem with anyone on the basis of Race,Religion (Or the lack there of),or Sexual preference.

I'm not in favor of Child Molestation or R*pe in any way shape or form,the same goes for murder,Home Invasions,and Kidnappings.

I feel that people should live as they want to live,and respect others rights.

I am not for forcing anyone to do anything against their will,if a few wanted to live in a socialist society that's fine as long as they only take voluntary members,and respect the rights of those that don't share their views.

Still waiting for your Answers Jill.

Godslayer Jillian 06-29-2009 01:20 AM

God, you're a fucking idiot.

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 01:24 AM

Nope,just showing how much of a hypocrite you are,I don't have a problem answering questions Jill,I seemed to have answered most of yours.

But you've tried to worm your way out of answering mine.

Corpsey 06-29-2009 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank Herbert
Consitutions become the ultimate tyranny. They're organised power on such a scale as to be overwhelming. The constitution is social power mobilised and it has no concience. it can crush the highest and the lowest, removing all dignity and individuality. It has an unstable balance point and no limitations when humans have limitations

As for guns, I'm against them.

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 02:09 AM

Which is why I'm glad that you are where you are and have no bearing on what rights others should and should not have in this country.

Godslayer Jillian 06-29-2009 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deadmanwalking_05 (Post 546021)
Nope,just showing how much of a hypocrite you are,I don't have a problem answering questions Jill,I seemed to have answered most of yours.

But you've tried to worm your way out of answering mine.

Nope, I blatantly refuse to answer yours because any other person that actually thinks would know an anarchist is against any type of government. Didn't feel the need to answer your question anymore than if you asked me if I "obey everything God says". That's why you're an idiot.
Either you're asking me a question you already know the answer because that's all you have, or you are genuinely that stupid.

Meanwhile, you actually equated my disbelief in what you stand for for my being in favor of murder, ****, kidnappings, and robbery! Anyone else knows exactly why you're an idiot. All these posts are just my effort to let you know too.

Tam Li Hua 06-29-2009 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deadmanwalking_05 (Post 546007)
So in others words Jillian you disagree with everything the Constitution stands for?

Jillian is British, I believe. I doubt he cares very much for the Constitution one way or the other.

Quote:

And by extension you have no problem with Robbery,R*pings,Murders,Home invasions,Kidnappings,or Child Molestation ?
One doesn't have to believe in the Constitution in order to believe those things are wrong. :/ Most, if not all, of those things are considered illegal in just about -every- country.

Seriously, Deadman, where are you getting these ideas?

Godslayer Jillian 06-29-2009 08:23 AM

I was mildly amused. British? No, I actually am an American citizen. But why should I care for the Constitution to the point of consider it sacred?
As you pointed out no one needs to believe in the Constitution 'in order to believe those things are wrong', especially when we remember that the constitution only details the fucking division of powers. They only included civil rights and liberties as an addendum we now know as the Bill of Rights. It wasn't part of the Constitution. That Deadman still talks about Constitution Constitution Constitution like that makes me wonder if he even know what the Constitution actually says.

Tam Li Hua 06-29-2009 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian (Post 546051)
I was mildly amused. British? No, I actually am an American citizen. But why should I care for the Constitution to the point of consider it sacred?

Oh, sorry about that! I don't know why I thought you were British.

And yes, his...enthusiasm for the Constitution is a little frightening.

Quote:

As you pointed out no one needs to believe in the Constitution 'in order to believe those things are wrong', especially when we remember that the constitution only details the fucking division of powers. They only included civil rights and liberties as an addendum we now know as the Bill of Rights. It wasn't part of the Constitution. That Deadman still talks about Constitution Constitution Constitution like that makes me wonder if he even know what the Constitution actually says.
I tend to agree.

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 04:11 PM

What's so frightening about it?

The fact that I think everyone is born to have the same rights as others?

Because if that's what scares you so much you need to re-evauluate yourself.

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian (Post 546045)
Nope, I blatantly refuse to answer yours because any other person that actually thinks would know an anarchist is against any type of government. Didn't feel the need to answer your question anymore than if you asked me if I "obey everything God says". That's why you're an idiot.
Either you're asking me a question you already know the answer because that's all you have, or you are genuinely that stupid.

Meanwhile, you actually equated my disbelief in what you stand for for my being in favor of murder, ****, kidnappings, and robbery! Anyone else knows exactly why you're an idiot. All these posts are just my effort to let you know too.

If you won't answer my questions why should I answer yours?

Because it shows you lack the guts to state exactly what you feel is right,and when a "Man" can't or won't say what he stands for,he offers the answer to everything,which is NOTHING.

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 04:27 PM

At least the Hippies had some gumption about them back in the 60's.

Godslayer Jillian 06-29-2009 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deadmanwalking_05 (Post 546078)
If you won't answer my questions why should I answer yours?

You fucking idiot.
I never asked you a legitimate question. I just flipped your own question to show how idiotic and fearmongering it is. AND YOU ANSWERED IT ANYWAY!

You fail twice! And I already answered your fucking question, and that you ask me to answer it again shows you that:
- you're an idiot in that your question is nothing but bullshit rhetoric
- you're an idiot in that you actually asked an anarchist if he wanted a one world state
- you're an idiot in that you didn't see I already respond you

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian (Post 546085)
You fucking idiot.
I never asked you a legitimate question. I just flipped your own question to show how idiotic and fearmongering it is. AND YOU ANSWERED IT ANYWAY!

You fail twice! And I already answered your fucking question, and that you ask me to answer it again shows you that:
- you're an idiot in that your question is nothing but bullshit rhetoric
- you're an idiot in that you actually asked an anarchist if he wanted a one world state
- you're an idiot in that you didn't see I already respond you

And I answered the questions even though they were the same questions I asked,to prove I have nothing to hide.

You seem to have something to hide though.

Godslayer Jillian 06-29-2009 06:18 PM

I have answered your questions. It's stupid that you keep saying the same thing; seriously, it's sad.

On the other hand, you made fucking idiotic questions. Then when I flipped them you fucking responded them, another example of idiocy. And then, somehow, you claimed you won't answer these questions you answered to which I didn't demand an answer. What's your IQ?

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 06:47 PM

If I've proven myself to be an Idiot,then why are you still talking to me.

Seems like a conversation between two idiots if you ask me.

Or is one pretending to be an idiot just to drive the true idiot crazy?

How smart are you feeling right now Jillian?

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 06:59 PM

You Claim to be an Anarchist but you have no idea of proper implementation,and the repercussions of Anarchy.

Godslayer Jillian 06-29-2009 07:02 PM

He deadman, I propose something. I'll stop calling you an idiot by not addressing you until you can make an assertion that is based on anything.
Just about anything, but back it up. Your pathetic ad hominems and pretensions of moral higher ground are becoming tiresome.

See you when you can make a half-smart argument.

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 08:11 PM

I am a man of my word Jill.

The Best thing that has ever came from Anarchy....
(I will copy and paste this message Unchanged in the Pro/Anti Thread.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Constitution

The Reasons I link Anarchy to early U.S. history should be pretty clear.

The King of England and his regime were harshly taxing the Colonists,and in turn the Occupying British soldiers had more than worn out their welcome.

The Boston Massacre for Example.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party

Followed shortly by The Boston Tea Party.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party

The Colonists sought to Govern Themselves,and form their own Nation with their own system of Government,the Crown didn't Agree and wanted to keep as much control as possible.

So...we have the American Revolutonary War (A.K.A. The U.S. War For Independence).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Revolutionary_War

Which leads Back to this...the best thing to ever come from Anarchy.

The U.S. Constitution.

The Fore Fathers were Anarchists to the Crown or English Parliament.

And by going against the End Result of the very thing you claim to be,shows you for the moron you are.

So again Jill how smart are you feeling now?
__________________
"The Answer To 1984 IS 1776"
I may be crazy to a few...but at least I'm Committed.

Godslayer Jillian 06-29-2009 08:20 PM

I laugh at your excitement of so pathetic an argument that you couldn't wait and PMd it to me too.

Exactly my answer to this in the PM:

Much smarter than you. You're still a fucking idiot.
The English Crown wasn't taxing Americans to death. Do you even know what you're talking about? Americans were taxed less than a fourth of what the British themselves paid as taxes, and taxation only began after the war with France. We might have just seen what happened to America without the British forces back then, huh?
And no, the forefathers were not anachists. They were capitalists and capitalism is irredeemable among anarchists. Besides, the 'forefathers' were self appointed, and only a third of Americans actively wanted to war against England.

How smart are YOU feeling right now?

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 08:52 PM

They were being forced to pay a tax without representation,which the Colonists didn't pay,and because they didn't pay, it resulted in a state of Anarchy (In the form of a War with the English Crown).

And after that state of Anarchy (Because the Outcome of the War was in doubt for awhile),they decided that the best Government is hardly any Government at all but laws for the people to interpret as they see fit.
But not to force their Interpretation on others.

And you get the U.S. Constitution.

Which you seem to hate.

Godslayer Jillian 06-29-2009 09:11 PM

Let me ask you something. Why do you believe the Constitution is anarchist and makes a small government when all its articles except the amendments are nothing but a detailing of the State's permanence?

Your talk about the constitution having to do shit with freedom is laughable.

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 10:52 PM

The Bill of Rights Wasn't tacked on as an after thought,but as a Check and Balance for the Citizens against a Government with too much control.

Deadmanwalking_05 06-29-2009 11:27 PM

The Constitution came from Anarchy I didn't say that it was an Anarchist document.

Corpsey 06-30-2009 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deadmanwalking_05
Which is why I'm glad that you are where you are and have no bearing on what rights others should and should not have in this country.

You mistake me from someone who would want to have a bearing on what rights people like you should have in your country. I was merely pointing out my thoughts on what a constitution can become: an ultimate source of tyranny.

Oh, and just a small comparison for a concerned American citizen at ye olde yokel from the Antipodes:

Transparency International Corruption Perception Index:

New Zealand = 3 with 9.4

United States of America = 20 with 7.2

Deadmanwalking_05 06-30-2009 01:05 AM

The possibility of perversion does exist,but that goes with any form of Government.

That possibility is avoided though as long as people remember that others have the same rights.

Those that ignore the rights of others,get what they deserve.

Tam Li Hua 06-30-2009 01:05 PM

I tend to think that, with the way things are going under this new administration, that we are very well on our way to a more socialist-type government, to be honest.

There's just far too many folks who would rather have the government make their decisions than deciding things for themselves.

I. E., our government's already been corrupted, because that's what happens to people when they gain that much power.

Deadmanwalking_05 06-30-2009 02:28 PM

And they can continue to be part of that Government.

I won't.

Tam Li Hua 07-01-2009 06:45 AM

Deadman: That's fine; you can move to a different country that isn't socialist when the time comes. =) Or, if you insist on protesting instead, make it a peaceful protest, please.

Me personally, I would probably just take my husband and move to Jamaica or something. XD XD XD

Saya 07-01-2009 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tam Li Hua (Post 546219)
Me personally, I would probably just take my husband and move to Jamaica or something. XD XD XD

Because living in one of the worst homophobic countries in the Americas, with one of the highest murder rates in the world is so much better than living in a semi-socialist country where everyone can get free health care...?

Corpsey 07-01-2009 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saya
Because living in one of the worst homophobic countries in the Americas, with one of the highest murder rates in the world is so much better than living in a semi-socialist country where everyone can get free health care...?

That was a beautiful retort, Saya.

Tam Li Hua 07-02-2009 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saya (Post 546220)
Because living in one of the worst homophobic countries in the Americas, with one of the highest murder rates in the world is so much better than living in a semi-socialist country where everyone can get free health care...?

Ok, maybe not Jamaica then. Perhaps Singapore or Hong Kong instead.

Joker_in_the_Pack 07-02-2009 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deadmanwalking_05 (Post 546123)
The Bill of Rights Wasn't tacked on as an after thought,but as a Check and Balance for the Citizens against a Government with too much control.

Ok, You're talking about a National Constitution. It's a document of how the nation can and will be run, yeah?

Having representatives (less than a tiny fucking percent of the total population) meet up and write out how the country will run and how EVERYONE will live, even in the BAREST BONES, is not anarchist by nature. They're bloody governing other god damn people. I'm half awake and half sober and I still think your arguments are shit-tacular. Not ONLY did the constitution NOT come out of anarchism, they founders were UNanarchistic. The fact they made a federal government, shit, ANY government. How about the electoral-fuck-college? How about the fact the freedoms were itemized (meaning there is inherently a limit).

How about you think of a good argument and stop asking Bill O'Reily to think of your snappy comebacks.

Saya 07-02-2009 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tam Li Hua (Post 546272)
Ok, maybe not Jamaica then. Perhaps Singapore or Hong Kong instead.

Hong Kong, who's democracy is compromised by the Chinese government (who, I don't know if you know this, has a bit of a reputation of being a fucking totalitarian state) but also has that oh so scary healthcare, and Signapore where the Jehovah Witness church is outlawed, caning is a common punishment, and male homosexuality is outlawed with a punishment of time in jail.

Like really, I can understand arguing for and against things like universal health care and welfare, but you still have it amazingly lucky compared to the countries you apparently want to retreat to. I'm sure you can suck it up and get a free trip to the doctor when you need it rather than when you can afford it, rather than enjoy your privilege as a foreigner in another country where others suffer horribly because of their controlling governments.

Tam Li Hua 07-02-2009 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saya (Post 546284)
Hong Kong, who's democracy is compromised by the Chinese government (who, I don't know if you know this, has a bit of a reputation of being a fucking totalitarian state) but also has that oh so scary healthcare, and Signapore where the Jehovah Witness church is outlawed, caning is a common punishment, and male homosexuality is outlawed with a punishment of time in jail.

I've visited both, and neither are nearly as terrible as you make them out to be. I lived in China proper for three years, so I think I'd be more than okay in Hong Kong. I did some charity work in Singapore for 6 weeks back in college, and the same goes for it; not really scared to move there. [Then again, I don't plan on going around spray-painting cars, am not a JW, and am not a gay man, so I think I'd be okay.

I -do- like chewing gum, though. I'd probably miss that a little.]

Quote:

Like really, I can understand arguing for and against things like universal health care and welfare, but you still have it amazingly lucky compared to the countries you apparently want to retreat to. I'm sure you can suck it up and get a free trip to the doctor when you need it rather than when you can afford it, rather than enjoy your privilege as a foreigner in another country where others suffer horribly because of their controlling governments.
No country is perfect, and I've already done a lot of foreign travel and living. It's not quite the horror experience you may think it is. lol

That being said, I'm well aware of the freedoms available in the States. That doesn't make me like it any better, though.

Saya 07-02-2009 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tam Li Hua (Post 546296)
I've visited both, and neither are nearly as terrible as you make them out to be. I lived in China proper for three years, so I think I'd be more than okay in Hong Kong. I did some charity work in Singapore for 6 weeks back in college, and the same goes for it; not really scared to move there. [Then again, I don't plan on going around spray-painting cars, am not a JW, and am not a gay man, so I think I'd be okay.

I -do- like chewing gum, though. I'd probably miss that a little.]

So because it doesn't affect you, you don't care, whereas unless you're making tons of money socialism will only work in your favour? Regardless of the fact that things like universal healthcare are just the government taking a little tiny step to the left, its not full blown socialism and probably won't go that way for a very long time, its just that for some reason socialism is a bad word so people love to throw it around.

Quote:

No country is perfect, and I've already done a lot of foreign travel and living. It's not quite the horror experience you may think it is. lol

That being said, I'm well aware of the freedoms available in the States. That doesn't make me like it any better, though.
They aren't horrible if you're white and foreign, but its still less free than it would be in the States, and if you're going to move on the principal of socialism, you're still going to find things that are objectionable in any country you go to, and in the case of Hong Kong you're going to find a similar set up anyway, with no guns and healthcare.

Deadmanwalking_05 07-02-2009 12:36 PM

That's why it wouldn't bother me in the Least to stand and fight with everything I have left.

That's why I'm staying,there is no free land (To me that is) left in the world.

and I would rather make my own choice instead of have it made for me.

Those "People" that don't want to live by their own decisions,are Sheep of the first order,and probably wouldn't know how to function in a truely Free society.

(Just my Opinion)

Tam Li Hua 07-02-2009 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saya (Post 546298)
So because it doesn't affect you, you don't care, whereas unless you're making tons of money socialism will only work in your favour? Regardless of the fact that things like universal healthcare are just the government taking a little tiny step to the left, its not full blown socialism and probably won't go that way for a very long time, its just that for some reason socialism is a bad word so people love to throw it around.

Hm. That's a good point.

Truth is, I just don't enjoy the States, whether or not it goes socialist. I prefer to travel to exotic places and experience new and different things. The socialist thing just weirds me out, since the U. S. government has supposedly been against it for so long.

Quote:

They aren't horrible if you're white and foreign, but its still less free than it would be in the States, and if you're going to move on the principal of socialism, you're still going to find things that are objectionable in any country you go to, and in the case of Hong Kong you're going to find a similar set up anyway, with no guns and healthcare.
I know it's less free. Trust me, I know.. But, East Asia's always appealed to me more than the States. I can't really explain it; it just has.

In fact, if it weren't for some very....unusual events [culture shock notwithstanding], I most likely would have never left.

Godslayer Jillian 07-02-2009 02:27 PM

So you're just pulling words out of your ass for no actual argument, huh?

Which reminds me I never posted my response:
Quote:

The Bill of Rights Wasn't tacked on as an after thought,but as a Check and Balance for the Citizens against a Government with too much control.
Yes it was, to the first. No it wasn't, to the second. When was the last time you took a history class?
The Bill of Rights was tacked in to the Constitution because of constant demands from the Anti-Federalists who were against the Constitution. They knew that the constitution, being only a text that detailed the perpetuation of the state and its branches, had nothing that would protect individual rights.
So fuck you and your Constitution fetish. Not only is your opinion stupid, but it's blatantly and factually wrong and ignorant.

Quote:

The Constitution came from Anarchy I didn't say that it was an Anarchist document.
Ah yes, my mistake. The fact that the Constitution was written by people who according to you were "Anarchists to the Crown or English Parliament" does not imply that the 'anarchist' drafters would draft an 'anarchist' paper.
But what's the point of this? By that same logic the Constitution is humanist because it was written by humans and evolutionist because it's the only way we would have come about.

Onyx 07-02-2009 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tam Li Hua (Post 546302)
Hm. That's a good point.

Truth is, I just don't enjoy the States, whether or not it goes socialist. I prefer to travel to exotic places and experience new and different things. The socialist thing just weirds me out, since the U. S. government has supposedly been against it for so long.

So what you're trying to say is that you don't find a slight shift towards socialism all that bad, you just have no understanding of what socialism is so the word creeps you out? And because the rich ruling class, those with the most to lose with more socialist policies, as opposed to benefiting off the capitalist policies that let them r*ape the rest of the country, have been against it so long is your reasoning behind why the word creeps you out?

Joker_in_the_Pack 07-03-2009 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onyx (Post 546309)
So what you're trying to say is that you don't find a slight shift towards socialism all that bad, you just have no understanding of what socialism is so the word creeps you out? And because the rich ruling class, those with the most to lose with more socialist policies, as opposed to benefiting off the capitalist policies that let them r*ape the rest of the country, have been against it so long is your reasoning behind why the word creeps you out?

It's like talking to the kelp that sticks to your legs at the beach. Just ignore it and pray it washes away.

Deadmanwalking_05 07-03-2009 03:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian (Post 546303)
So you're just pulling words out of your ass for no actual argument, huh?

Which reminds me I never posted my response:
Yes it was, to the first. No it wasn't, to the second. When was the last time you took a history class?
The Bill of Rights was tacked in to the Constitution because of constant demands from the Anti-Federalists who were against the Constitution. They knew that the constitution, being only a text that detailed the perpetuation of the state and its branches, had nothing that would protect individual rights.
So fuck you and your Constitution fetish. Not only is your opinion stupid, but it's blatantly and factually wrong and ignorant.

Ah yes, my mistake. The fact that the Constitution was written by people who according to you were "Anarchists to the Crown or English Parliament" does not imply that the 'anarchist' drafters would draft an 'anarchist' paper.
But what's the point of this? By that same logic the Constitution is humanist because it was written by humans and evolutionist because it's the only way we would have come about.


What you are completely failing to grasp Jill,is the fact that maybe the framers of the constitution and Bill Of Rights had seen Anarchy in all it's blood riddled glory on the battlefields that were now their front yards (Respectively,I'm not that far off),and just maybe they came up with a better way in those two Documents.

The Constitution is a big frame work for a big government,but it's the usage of the B.O.R. that limits the Government growing out of control,instead of questioning what was said we went along with it,until I think it's time to use the B.O.R. (In as peaceful a way as possible) to end what's currently going on.

Or to lose it and by doing so accept any fate that a Jack Booted Thug (J.B.T.) feels is necessary.

I'll stand and try to use the B.O.R. in as peaceful a way as I can.

But

If/When the peaceful way fails to work,they will have one tough son of a bitch to try and kill.

Tam Li Hua 07-03-2009 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onyx (Post 546309)
So what you're trying to say is that you don't find a slight shift towards socialism all that bad, you just have no understanding of what socialism is so the word creeps you out? And because the rich ruling class, those with the most to lose with more socialist policies, as opposed to benefiting off the capitalist policies that let them r*ape the rest of the country, have been against it so long is your reasoning behind why the word creeps you out?

I don't like the idea of the U. S. government making my choices for me. It's just far too corrupt, and I don't trust it.

Ideally, I would take my husband to a deserted island and make our own private getaway where no one else would be allowed unless we let them in.

Tam Li Hua 07-03-2009 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joker_in_the_Pack (Post 546328)
It's like talking to the kelp that sticks to your legs at the beach. Just ignore it and pray it washes away.

Indeed. Yet, the more you play with the kelp, the more of it sticks to you.

Godslayer Jillian 07-03-2009 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tam Li Hua (Post 546348)
I don't like the idea of the U. S. government making my choices for me. It's just far too corrupt, and I don't trust it.

You'd rather have a private insurance company making your choices for you? And you'd rather go to an even more socialized country that means they 'make more choices for you'? Your argument is fucking stupid.

Deadmanwalking_05 07-04-2009 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian (Post 546362)
You'd rather have a private insurance company making your choices for you? And you'd rather go to an even more socialized country that means they 'make more choices for you'? Your argument is fucking stupid.

You're attacking someone else based only on their ideas and beliefs,yet you try and paint me in that light.

You have done far more to show your true character than I ever could.

Thanks for showing your true colors,I knew you would sooner or later.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:33 PM.