Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Corpsey
How so? Does it depend on who gets killed? I think that if the population gets decimated(or more accurately, massacred) then whoever is left will have a massive power struggle to have the social structure that we currently have. In the process, anarchy will reign and things would get very ugly. I definately doubt that we (the human race) could benifit from the loss in population nuclear war would give us. I guess things would change after a while, but it would be a horrific period in time for the human race to undergo.
|
Tell me I've read too many comics, but I believe anarchy holds faces of both destruction AND creation. Anarchy is - as far as I'm concerned - creating a
tabula rasa, an empty canvas of rubble where people can build a better world. Anarchy without re-creation is not anarchy. That's just terrorism. And declaring a nuclear war is not anarchy - that's just stupidity and selfishness. I see anarchy as a fairly positive feature.
But permit me then to return to the topic. Should there be WWIII during my lifetime, I see that the people who began it deserve it. I'd feel sorry for all the innocent that would die as a victim of the war - possibly myself included - but in the end, it would only refresh the earth and its human population. Perhaps then anarchy may take place, and the survivors will build a new, better world to live.
(Please forgive my presence, I must admit I'm not fully sober at the moment. If I offended someone, I apologize and I may take back my words after a few hours.
)