[CptSternn]

Originally Posted by delicti

You're right, I did give the article a cursory read, and I missed that point.

So, much like the Moore thread, you have yet to read the information being discussed here, and jump in with a long reply, with no real understanding of what we are even discussing. Way to go.

I usually don't watch television unless my girlfriend has it on. The times I do watch I'm usually watching the History and Discovery channel. I find that network news is a great way to get frustrated about things that have no real impact on my life; sorry, didn't see it.

You don't think the loss of your constitutional rights 'has any real impact on your life'. Thats another brilliant statement there.

You're right, I did. These trials actually bore the crap out of me, because they usually are presented with such bias that it's hard to get anything close to the truth on them. As is, it's a legal proceeding, so we won't know the whole facts until after the trial is done anyways.

So even though such things 'bore the crap out of you', you still post large responses here on your opinion on something you can't be bothered to watch because it bores you. If you so 'bored', then why are you posting such long responses about a topic you claim to have not read about an issue you claim to find so boring?