Oh I know, but children still have rights, it's not like they're allowed to kill you to death with sticks.
After all, it's the Supreme Court's job to make sure lawyers have stuff to argue over so decisions are made as ambiguous as possible whilst they try to rule on an individual case without creating any real precedents outside of very narrow criteria. (Like with the ten commandments on government property thing, which is clearly unconstitutional, except when it isn't, let the lawyers fight over it)
So I know this isn't their stated job, but a lot of those lawyers have families to feed and children to stagnate.
|