Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian
First of all that's not even a complete sentence.
Second, honestly, that's how I see you, so why not stop trying to simply insult me and make something more meaningful with your time, like actually posing an argument?
|
Let's take a look at your style of argument:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian
Social darwinism really has been discarded. There's no evidence nor reasoning to back it up, after all.
|
That's not an argument; clearly you're an individual who has no understanding about Social Darwinism (but you still felt the need to be a worthless babbler and say your piece).
Moving on:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian
The biggest bullshit right now is that you're this close to demanding me to prove a negative.
Social Darwinism is a horrible misconstruction of Darwinian theory. Its whole premise of "survival of the fittest" applied to society is not even evolutionarily factual.
So if there's no scientific backing for social darwinism, then it just becomes a harsh form of ideal, emphasis on the 'ideal'.
|
The world does not belong to the meek; and there is no precedant you can cite me that disproves that.
Attractive, charismatic, sexy, outgoing, intelligent, powerful people rule this earth and command all social circles of any worth.
They decide.
Not the meek.
PS - I'll stop throwing insults at you when you demonstrate a modicum of intelligence, rather than just babbling for the sake of it.