Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steppenwolf
No . Hitler was a *mass-everyday* murder and the guys were *only one time* murders .
You can't say Hitler was worst just because the number .
Murder is murder is murder ...
They'll root in poverty? Sure , but in the meantime they'll have free school , free food and free shelter , while others like you and me will have to fight for this ... Some of us also will die really poor .
How ironic that some of them are the same ones who gave money for them while they were in jail , including the parents of the murdered girl .
Nah , to take the risk of trusting a psychiatrist (a human who judge another at the end of the day) is much too risky .
I dont think psychiatry is a serious science , and I honestly dont think every ape who is a pychiatrist is able to really see what is inside someone's mind .
I said that I felt sorry for everyone involved in this horrible case , sure I do ... But see what Hitler did , he shot himself . That was the best thing he ever did for the germans and for the whole world .
Those cowards are unable to finish their lifes , and we all have to support them financially ... And then we'll probably see them outside in 3 years .
No . Just ... No .
I cant put human lifes at risk just to "see what happens" ...
|
If you can compare Hitler with those three drunken teenagers, something is terribly wrong with you. Terribly, terribly wrong.
Have you ever tried to actually
gain some knowledge about his deeds so you could tell this? Or are you just trying to be "fair" by telling that every stupid drunken, maybe even visious if you insist, teenager who can't control himself can be immediately compared to Hitler?