View Single Post
Old 08-25-2009, 10:56 PM   #35
gothicusmaximus
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terminus View Post
What's the objective standard for "good", in this case?
The producers', for the most part. I'm not bemoaning the fact that I personally don't enjoy every single film ever created, I'm addressing the fact that, under capitalism, movie studios often very deliberately prefer their pictures to be optimally profitable rather than optimally well-made, e.g. "That writer is too expensive, the cheaper script won't make the trailer any worse", "You need something for the teenage boys", "No one will see a three hour western, Mr. Leone."

Quote:
I understand that capitalism can suffer from human nature, but what would then make socialism less impervious to this (or is it)?
Do you mean "less susceptible" to this? Assuming you do, it isn't, it's simply susceptible in different ways, the nature of which depends on that of the socialist state.
gothicusmaximus is offline   Reply With Quote