How dare you accuse me of being unable to debate when your response was a single sarcastic sentance that didn't at all communicate what you meant it to? I assumed you meant by "efficiency" that somehow the model I described would create waste, which is the exact opposite of what would happen. Besides, how am I supposed to take your argument seriously when you're talknig about beaurocracy, which is an inherantly hierarchical structure, and I'm talking anarchism?
I stand by the fact that people would have to work fewer hours if small ammounts of high quality goods were created as need was assessed; things aren't "made the way they used to" because you sell more crap that way.
I didn't accuse you of being against voting and making suggestions, I accused you of thinking that people are unable to orgnize themselves in such a way that they could discuss issues faced by their community.
|