Well that isn't the end of my theory. Based on limits (which I didn't add here because it gets a little complex and I don't know how much math you know, nor do I want my proof stolen) I prove that after the big crunch there is infinite repetition. Like your article says Bourbonboy. Yes you are right Versus, critical density plays a big part but we already know the expansion rate of the universe thanx to the Hubble Constant and observing Cepheid Galaxies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versus
I don't usually see that approach from many people. I always imagined that adding more variables that are required to be true decreased the probability of something occurring. Like, adding moving parts increases that chance of a failure.
How would you reconcile that conflict in the absence of information?
Her major is religious studies.
|
Well, it does that's why you use the contradiction method of approach. You assume one thing, then logically deduce things from that assumption based on facts gathered and if you reach a contradiction then you know that the first thing you assumed is false. That's how we isolate the variable.
In the absence of information then I go to the scientific method of conducting an experiment and finding the information out myself. All I need to know about God is in the bible according to my faith and his words that nothing more is needed to added or taken away from to the bible otherwise there are curses and plagues. So, science is the only empty piece and we figure that anything that is observable in the universe can be studied by our methods. Of course I keep an open mind that our scientific method may be expanded upon in the future for various reasons, but still everything is pretty solid for the questions we have in mind at the moment.