[Binkie]

If the adults have a problem with it, they need to fight. THEY need to fight for the land. Not have their 6 year old son or daughter go die for it, then turn around from the saftey of wherever after they've been martyred and conceive yet another nail bomb delivery system for the same purpose.

I don't care if you own 40 acre beach front property in Saudi Arabia located on an oasis that's been in your family for 2,000 years. Ask yourself, is a plot of dirt and sand worth the life of your child? Is arid land worth more than the life of a young child who really can't make any decisions on his/her own? Is it ok, from your point of view, for them to decide for their children when they are to die and what for before they can grow up? I believe I got your take on this already, which is what I was arguing.

Can they? They should with programs like the UNRWA and countries like Jordan giving citizenship to refugees, enabling them to work there and survive on their own without restrictions. But since I know you're trying to bait me into another arguement, I'll say "no" so that we can stay on topic of the original issue. Should they? It's a matter of debate, dependant on how you view the course of history, but we can lean towards saying, "No," for the benefit of not starting another arguement. With both answered as, "no," does that make it right for displaced adults to send their 6 year old children off to blow themselves up for land? It'll always come back to the same question and same answer from you. We're not arguing anything else. Just that question, which you've already answered.