I'm a bit worn out at the moment, since what was supposed to be a day off mutated into my 17th straight day of working, so I'm gonna have to reply piecemeal instead of one large post. If someone's post isn't replied to, don't worry, I'll get to it as my brain lets me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saya
You don't seem to realize the difference between systemic oppression and prejudice. Sure, goths are prejudiced against, furries are prejudiced against, atheists are prejudiced against, etc. But there isn't systemic oppression in place.
|
I kind of get what is meant by systemic oppression vs. prejudice. The former is a legally institutionalized means, based and originating in prejudice, to force those society, or sects of society, view as "inferior" into disadvantageous positions, with the backing of political and legal authority. My view of prejudice is often that of the sinister potential beginnings of systemic oppression. Having seen what prejudice has a tendency to manifest into, well...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saya
If you're white, did you know you're more likely to receive a kidney transplant, in faster time, and get a better quality kidney? Did you know when slavery was abolished, vagrancy laws were created to place more and more black people in prison so their labour could be exploited in prison? Did you know that 75% of bisexual women have been sexually assaulted? Most of ant-LGBT violence is against trans people?
|
The first one, I greatly suspected. Even if I didn't have statistical knowledge of it, I've seen enough enduring racism in American society to figure this was certainly the case. After looking up the statistics, my suspicions were, sadly, proven to be all too true. Being white means you have almost twice the likelihood to be referred for a kidney transplant to someone who was black. The second part...not
entirely true, but only because a lack of specification. Vagrancy laws had existed for quite some time before that, with extremely harsh penalties. After the Civil War, though, most southern states implemented the "Black codes" which indeed were designed for specifically that reason. They were based in those pre-existing vagrancy laws, and used for the ends of the southern states, whose economy had been backed by slave labor. Sore losers...
The third, however, is not precisely true, though the rate is still far too high. Honestly, 1% would be too high regardless, but I digress. The actual rate of sexual assault against bisexual women is 46.1%, and 61.1% of all bisexual women had endured sexual assault, physical abusive, and/or stalking by a current/former partner. Granted, the sample size for straight women in this study was far larger than the ones for lesbians and bisexual women (9,709 included in study; 96.5% identified as straight, 2.2% and 1.3% for bisexuals and lesbians, respectively), so the sample might not be conclusive...but then...lesbians and straight women both reported less incidents of ****, abuse, and/or stalking, so... Either way, I understand what you're saying on this point all the same. Just my nitpicking for statistics and sources here, is all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saya
You don't see how you benefit from it because its supposed to be a "fair" system, but its only fair to some people.
|
All too unpleasantly true.