I hate....

[Geoluhread]

Hehe
Then my best regards ^^


** i hate How hot it is right now...

[honeythorn]

I hate the fact it's Monday tomorrow, which means work, but on the other hand I badly need the money so I guess I shouldn't really hate it.

[Paigeybobert]

I hate anti-depressants.
I hate pornos.
I hate most of my friends.
I hate ignorance.
I hate assholey men.
I hate Hillary Clinton.
I hate Country music. (It really pisses me off)
I hate money.
I hate distortion.
I hate Linkin Park.
I hate chocolate.

[Geoluhread]

If you hate your friends, why do you call them friends?
Hmm *thinks*

[TurquoiseXx]

You hate chocolate?! Oh my goodness... I think it's so good :P

[Joker_in_the_Pack]

Originally Posted by honeythorn

I'm not ungrateful of other things, but the no touching thing is problematic when it comes to men. ( and the fact men see me as a friend only , I strongly suspect due to my huge size ). Seriously once the weight is gone I'll be able to be reasonably more normal, which hope fully may attract a male thing with which to plaaaaay

A big problem is the fact your lack of confidence is transmitted to others easily. If you don't like how you look, nobody else will. Everything starts within.

[Pineapple_Juice]

I hate having a bad hair day. I hate it worse when I'm unable to correct it because I'm only having the bad hair day 'cause I need a haircut and can't decide what I want or who's gonna cut it.

When I have bad hair it makes the rest of my day bad, I'm serious.

[honeythorn]

Originally Posted by Joker_in_the_Pack

A big problem is the fact your lack of confidence is transmitted to others easily. If you don't like how you look, nobody else will. Everything starts within.

Precisely. That's why I'm on a diet so that I will eventually feel better about how I look, which may be seen outwardly also.

[Noirette]

I hate the way I look.
I hate when most of the people compliment me.

I can't stand unnecessary cruelty.

[Duane]

I hate how no matter how much I want things to work out good, they always end up working out bad...

[Noirette]

honeythorn, you are beautiful.

[coffy x]

Originally Posted by gothicusmaximus

Neither one is 'sick'. Intercourse with children is as sick as sexually assaulting adults, because children don't possess the maturity necessary to consent. The attraction, however, is not the crime, the deed itself is. The pedophile cannot help his sexual preference any more than you can help yours, yet you would despise and judge him for it, even if he never even looks at a kid for too long.

Okay, so you see absolutely nothing wrong with this preference? You don't think it's sick? So you don't find it sick when a pedophile looks at child porn even though he's just thinking about it? So you don't find it sick that a pedophile even thinks of innocent and naive children as sex objects? Do you have children? I don't. But I can still say that it's sick. If you had/have children, could you honestly say that if knew someone who openly admitted to being a pedophile, you would let that pedophile near your child? All the time you know that he's probably fantasizing about your child or is probably having some inappropriate thoughts about your child? Okay, so, it's okay to let a pedophile who's never molested a child work in day cares, boy and girl camps and shit, even while he's just thinking about children as sex objects? We're talking about children here and grown ass women and men, not another child and another child.

It's not a crime when they don't act, true. But it's sick when it involves thinking about sexual intercourse with a child or some 5-year-old child's genitals when you're fucking 50. I'm not saying ********** should be stoned or hung up to dry, but that they should be viewed as potentially dangerous against children.

I'm done with this because obviously some us have a twisted ass view of pedophilia.

Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian

Man, that is stupid. You realize it's stupid, right? Because it's stupid.
Why would gothicus maximus try to decry gays and blacks by calling them paedophiles if he's defending paedophilia?
Your comment is stupid because you're accusing someone of something when it's only you who finds offensive. Think of this: "Mexicans are cunts because they like tacos." "Hey, you know, some americans like tacos too" "Don't you dare say that Americans like tacos." That's just bullshit.
Maybe what you mean to say is that SOME gays and SOME blacks are r@pists, just like some paedophiles and some whites and some priests can be.
But then why the fuck are you singling out paedophiles?

Are you the one that said " them n.iggers"? Is it not 2008? Is it still the 1950's or 1850's? Why are we still saying "n.gger"? We, n.iggers, could've easily been referred to as "blacks" in the first place, but now you want to do it here.

Maybe that overshadowed what really was said. I jumped the gun.

[Joker_in_the_Pack]

Originally Posted by coffy x

Okay, so you see absolutely nothing wrong with this preference? You don't think it's sick? So you don't find it sick when a pedophile looks at child porn even though he's just thinking about it? So you don't find it sick that a pedophile even thinks of innocent and naive children as sex objects? Do you have children? I don't. But I can still say that it's sick. If you had/have children, could you honestly say that if knew someone who openly admitted to being a pedophile, you would let that pedophile near your child? All the time you know that he's probably fantasizing about your child or is probably having some inappropriate thoughts about your child? Okay, so, it's okay to let a pedophile who's never molested a child work in day cares, boy and girl camps and shit, even while he's just thinking about children as sex objects? We're talking about children here and grown ass women and men, not another child and another child.

It's not a crime when they don't act, true. But it's sick when it involves thinking about sexual intercourse with a child or some 5-year-old child's genitals when you're fucking 50. I'm not saying ********** should be stoned or hung up to dry, but that they should be viewed as potentially dangerous against children.

I'm done with this because obviously some us have a twisted ass view of pedophilia.




Are you the one that said " them n.iggers"? Is it not 2008? Is it still the 1950's or 1850's? Why are we still saying "n.gger"? We, n.iggers, could've easily been referred to as "blacks" in the first place, but now you want to do it here.

Maybe that overshadowed what really was said. I jumped the gun.

You really are stupid. You fail to grasp that sexual preference isn't a conscious decision, and you fail to realize that not everyone has the same opinions that you do. Also, Jillians use of the word n.igger was to show you that your logic is ignorant and judgmental.

[MitsyMayhem]

Originally Posted by coffy x

Okay, so you see absolutely nothing wrong with this preference? You don't think it's sick? So you don't find it sick when a pedophile looks at child porn even though he's just thinking about it? So you don't find it sick that a pedophile even thinks of innocent and naive children as sex objects? Do you have children? I don't. But I can still say that it's sick. If you had/have children, could you honestly say that if knew someone who openly admitted to being a pedophile, you would let that pedophile near your child? All the time you know that he's probably fantasizing about your child or is probably having some inappropriate thoughts about your child? Okay, so, it's okay to let a pedophile who's never molested a child work in day cares, boy and girl camps and shit, even while he's just thinking about children as sex objects? We're talking about children here and grown ass women and men, not another child and another child.

It's not a crime when they don't act, true. But it's sick when it involves thinking about sexual intercourse with a child or some 5-year-old child's genitals when you're fucking 50. I'm not saying ********** should be stoned or hung up to dry, but that they should be viewed as potentially dangerous against children.

I'm done with this because obviously some us have a twisted ass view of pedophilia.




Are you the one that said " them n.iggers"? Is it not 2008? Is it still the 1950's or 1850's? Why are we still saying "n.gger"? We, n.iggers, could've easily been referred to as "blacks" in the first place, but now you want to do it here.

Maybe that overshadowed what really was said. I jumped the gun.

Goodness gracious.
Do you not realize that you make no sense?
I'll put it in simple terms.
Just because a man is sexually attracted to a woman, does not mean he's going to r.ape her.
Just because pedophile is sexually attracted to a child, does not mean he or she is going to r.ape the child.
Which is more dangerous?
The pedophile, or the other man?
Neither. My point is, no one is more dangerous than anyone else because of their sexual preference.

[Geoluhread]

^ i thought we closed that subject already!!

I'm sick of hearing this all over again!!

*crawls into bed*
Good night =<

[Godslayer Jillian]

I'm going to change everything you said to apply to gay people to show you how bigoted you are:

Originally Posted by coffy x

Okay, so you see absolutely nothing wrong with this preference? You don't think it's sick? So you don't find it sick when a homo looks at Abercrombie catalogues even though he's just thinking about it? So you don't find it sick that a homosecual even thinks of innocent and unexpecting men as sex objects? Do you have brothers? I don't. But I can still say that it's sick. If you had/have brothers, could you honestly say that if knew someone who openly admitted to being gay, you would let that homo near your child? All the time you know that he's probably fantasizing about your brother or is probably having some inappropriate thoughts about your brother or even you? Okay, so, it's okay to let a homosexual who's never a man serve in the military, unisex schools and shit, even while he's just thinking about men as sex objects? We're talking about men here and men, not another man and another woman.

It's not a crime when they don't act, true. But it's sick when it involves thinking about sexual intercourse with someone with your same genitals. I'm not saying homosexuals should be stoned or hung up to dry, but that they should be viewed as potentially dangerous against other people of the same sex.

I'm done with this because obviously some us have a twisted ass view of homosexuality.

Yeah, real ethical.

Why are we still saying "n.gger"? We, n.iggers, could've easily been referred to as "blacks" in the first place, but now you want to do it here.

Why? Because it's the same fucking logic you are using and that word simply gives a better impact to my argument.
I have no problem using the word n.igger. Are you really that weak that a word bothers you?
I have no problem being called a spic. It's not like it demeans my self-worth and makes the other person superior. I must be much better than you, I suppose.

[coffy x]

Originally Posted by Joker_in_the_Pack

You really are stupid. You fail to grasp that sexual preference isn't a conscious decision, and you fail to realize that not everyone has the same opinions that you do.

You really are stupid.

I grasped that it isn't a conscious decision. But that particular sexual preference is a sick one--one that should not be taken lightly or overlooked or written off as just another sexual preference when it involves children. I DO realize that not everyone has the same opinions that I do. Should I quote myself?

I'm done with this because obviously some us have a twisted ass view of pedophilia.

Originally Posted by Joker

Also, Jillians use of the word n.igger was to show you that your logic is ignorant and judgmental.

No, his use of the word "n.igger" was obscene and offensive. We all know what black people were called back in the day. That was not necessary to prove his point. I think that we all could've grasped the point he was making if he had said "them black men **** white women." What if I'd have said "them crackers **** black women", which is true of some white men back then, to prove a point of mine because some black people called white people crackers back in the day?

[Godslayer Jillian]

Originally Posted by MitsyMayhem

Just because a man is sexually attracted to a woman, does not mean he's going to r.ape her.
Just because pedophile is sexually attracted to a child, does not mean he or she is going to r.ape the child.
Which is more dangerous?
The pedophile, or the other man?
Neither.[/color]

Actually, following the idiotic logic they've used that says "it happens, so put them all in a black list", we heterosexual males are much worse than paedophiles. There's more 'regular' r@pes than there are child molestations after all.

[coffy x]

Like I said:

I'm done with this because obviously some us have a twisted ass view of pedophilia.

[MitsyMayhem]

Originally Posted by coffy x

You really are stupid.

I grasped that it isn't a conscious decision. But that particular sexual preference is a sick one--one that should not be taken lightly or overlooked or written off as just another sexual preference when it involves children. I DO realize that not everyone has the same opinions that I do. Should I quote myself?


No, his use of the word "n.igger" was obscene and offensive. We all know what black people were called back in the day. That was not necessary to prove his point. I think that we all could've grasped the point he was making if he had said "them black men **** white women." What if I'd have said "them crackers **** black women", which is true of some white men back then, to prove a point of mine because some black people called white people crackers back in the day?

I'm black.
See me throwing a fit?
Yeah.
Point proven.
I've learned a long time ago not to get offended.
It's stupid.
All all it does is give people control over you.

[Godslayer Jillian]

Coffy, how the fuck could you use as a closing statement that you have a twisted ass view on paedophilia?

[KontanKarite]

Originally Posted by coffy x

You really are stupid.

I grasped that it isn't a conscious decision. But that particular sexual preference is a sick one--one that should not be taken lightly or overlooked or written off as just another sexual preference when it involves children. I DO realize that not everyone has the same opinions that I do. Should I quote myself?







No, his use of the word "n.igger" was obscene and offensive. We all know what black people were called back in the day. That was not necessary to prove his point. I think that we all could've grasped the point he was making if he had said "them black men **** white women." What if I'd have said "them crackers **** black women", which is true of some white men back then, to prove a point of mine because some black people called white people crackers back in the day?

I'm white. You can call me a cracker. It doesn't hurt my feelings in the least bit. Shit. I'll call my self a honkey cracker white trash. Doesn't make it true, and has no weight or reflection of who I am.

[Godslayer Jillian]

Originally Posted by KontanKarite

I'm white. You can call me a cracker. It doesn't hurt my feelings in the least bit. Shit. I'll call my self a honkey cracker white trash. Doesn't make it true, and has no weight or reflection of who I am.

Shut up you cracker. You don't know what it's like. You have no idea how offensive words like n.igger and spic and chink are to us minorities. That's why we demand your help into censoring you so that we might not just accidentally start thinking we're actually inferior.

[KontanKarite]

Originally Posted by Godslayer Jillian

Shut up you cracker. You don't know what it's like. You have no idea how offensive words like n.igger and spic and chink are to us minorities. That's why we demand your help into censoring you so that we might not just accidentally start thinking we're actually inferior.

But I'm... of Irish decent. Remember what the Irish were called back in the day?

[gothicusmaximus]

So, basically, coffy x, you're totally comfortable with judging and punishing someone for something over which he or she has no control. That's the kind of person you are.
However, somehow, we're 'twisted'.