Don't get me wrong, I can understand thinking, "Well, all right, let's not get hysterical - we've all said shit to a select audience at some point that could have gotten us in trouble if others had heard." Which is true. But mostly I think I agree with Solumina - if someone is in a position of authority, then yes, they should be held to more stringent standards of conduct. This isn't a double-standard, so much as a way in which we demand that these people legitimise the power they have over us, and prove their worthiness of it. It's a form of accountability, and in this case, we can't even say it's an entirely irrelevant or arbitrary one; a judge laughing at racism, then going to work for a system that's known to be biased against non-whites, doesn't strike me as all that harmless.
__________________
"Friends are allowed to make mistakes. The enemy is not allowed to make mistakes because his whole existence is a mistake, and we suffer from it. But the women's liberation front and gay liberation front are our friends, they are our potential allies, and we need as many allies as possible.” - Huey Newton
|