Quote:
Originally Posted by CptSternn
Five hours after they supposedly shot him, they buried his body at sea. No pictures or DNA was taken, like they normally do as in the case of Che.
http://tinyurl.com/44fhh5s
This should end well.
It's not like he could have died of liver failure in a secret prison. |
*facepalm*
A SECRET PRISON? Really? REALLY?
It seems odd at first, but makes perfect sense if you actually think about it. After Saddam's sons were killed they embalmed the bodies and took pictures of them, and Muslims went CRAZY because this was some sort of blasphemy. Killing him and dumping his dumbass in the ocean quickly and quietly was the best way to deal with the situation. You do your best to avoid pissing off people (any more than they already are anyway) you conform (mostly) to Islamic law, which demands a speedy burial, and you eliminate the corpse and gravesite so that it can't be used as a rallying point for future militants.
Instead of using his body like it's important, instead of making it into a symbol you make it unimportant: you unceremoniously dump it into the ocean like so much garbage, to be sweallowed by the deep and annihilated.
If we had the will and capability to keep him in a secret prison (WHY?) and he died of liver failure, you REALLY think we'd just dump the body without showing anyone? Do you think we'd go through this giant charade just to tell everyone "he sleeps with the fishes?" Shit no, the five-Jew-Bankers would've put a bullet in his head, and made sure the doctor that autopsied him was on their payroll, and used his death as a MASSIVE propaganda tool.
Shit, they'd've stuffed his body and had Obama use him as a coat rack.
The very fact that this seems a little suspect to Americans is actually evidence of it's veracity: Because the response is perfectly logical, but seems counter-intuitive to our culture.
