 |

|
 |
| Spooky News Spooky news from around the web goes in this forum. Please always credit and link your source and only use sources which are okay with being posted. No profanity in subject headings please. |
07-02-2008, 03:44 AM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,587
|
Iraq throws open door to foreign oil firms
http://tinyurl.com/56k85m
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq opened its giant oilfields to foreign firms on Monday, putting British and U.S. companies in pole position five years after U.S.-led troops invaded the country to oust Saddam Hussein.
The move to invite bids for the development of Iraq's largest producing fields should mark the return of the oil majors whose cash and expertise Iraq needs to restore its oil infrastructure that has been hard hit by sanctions and war.
But any awards to U.S. and British firms could anger opponents of the invasion, who have said the 2003 war was designed to give Western oil companies control over Iraqi oil reserves. U.S. and British officials have denied the charges.
By allowing international firms to help raise output at its key producing oil fields, the Iraqi government is breaking with the policy of major oil-producing neighbors such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates where national firms keep tight control of foreign investment in their oil sectors.
"The six oilfields that have been announced today are the backbone of Iraq's oil production," Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani told a news conference.
"With its massive proven reserves, Iraq should not stay at its current level of production. Iraq should be the second or third largest oil-producing country."
Shahristani listed the fields as Rumaila, Kirkuk, Zubair, West Qurna Phase 1, Bai Hassan and Maysan -- which comprises three separate fields: Bazargan, Abu Gharab and Fakka.
The Oil Ministry said they were open for long-term development contracts. Iraq has prequalified 41 foreign firms.
Shahristani said he hoped contracts could be signed in June 2009 to raise output by a combined 1.5 million barrels per day at those fields. He added Iraq aimed to raise output to 4.5 million bpd by 2013 from the current 2.5 million bpd.
He said any firm that wanted to bid must open an office in Baghdad. Few foreign companies have any presence in Iraq because of the security situation.
Julian Lee, senior energy analyst at London's Centre for Global Energy Studies, said Iraq was a bit like Russia in the early to mid 1990s.
"No matter how risky you think it is, as an individual company you can't afford to be the only major international player that isn't interested," he said.
FRUSTRATION
Iraq said last week it also hoped to sign six short-term oil technical support contracts during the next month.
But Shahristani, showing frustration, said talks on deals that were supposed to quickly boost output at fields by utilizing the technical expertise of majors were still going on.
He said the firms were reluctant to sign the technical support contracts because they would offer their advice from abroad and preferred to be hands on with the fields.
"We are losing time," Shahristani added.
Taken together, the short-term and long-term contracts should open the door to major foreign involvement in the OPEC member's oil sector for the first time in nearly four decades.
Iraq's proven reserves, at 115 billion barrels, are the world's largest after Saudi Arabia and Iran. Deputy Prime Minister Barham Salih said in April that as yet unproven reserves could make the total as much as 350 billion barrels.
The short-term technical deals, each worth about $500 million, are aimed at lifting output at Iraq's largest producing fields by a combined 500,000 barrels a day.
Five of the short-term deals that have been under discussion are with Royal Dutch Shell; Shell in partnership with BHP Billiton; BP; Exxon Mobil and Chevron in partnership with Total.
Iraq has also been in talks with a consortium of Anadarko, Vitol and Dome for a sixth short-term contract.
Those talks on the short-term deals should give the majors concerned a head start in efforts to bid for future contracts, although Shahristani said no company would get any "privilege" in bidding for the fields announced on Monday.
RESENTMENT
U.S. State Department spokesman Tom Casey said: "The United States was not involved in any decisions to award contracts, to make determinations of what kinds of contracts would be offered, to provide advice over what kinds of contracts would be offered."
Many Iraqis still bear a grudge after British, American and French oil companies controlled their oil industry for half a century through the Iraq Petroleum Co (IPC).
It was an era when Western majors working in the Middle East used oil output and prices as an economic and political tool, analysts said.
From the time it struck oil at the huge Kirkuk field in 1927 until nationalism forced it out in 1972, IPC -- made up of BP, Exxon, Mobil, Shell, CFP (Total) and Partex -- ruled the roost. That did not go well with Baghdad, which resented IPC's control.
Oil is Iraq's main source of income and boosting output is key to earning the cash the country needs for reconstruction.
Iraq's cabinet agreed a new draft national oil law in February last year, but it has failed to get through parliament.
Baghdad has moved ahead with the contracts, saying this was in line with an old law in existence before the invasion.
|
|
|
07-02-2008, 03:48 AM
|
#2
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,587
|
And there it is. What everyone was saying they would do, they are doing.
Iraq like many nations is a nation founded on socialist ideals. The government owned all natural resources, and the monies raised were used to pay for public works, welfare, and other projects for the people.
The bush administration along with their new puppet government have now taken the resources from the people and are selling them off to private companies who will be taking the profits and making money, leaving the people of Iraq with nothing.
Just like in Nigeria. Just like they are trying to do here in Ireland. And just like they had done in Cuba and Venezuela, before the leaders there stepped in and took back the resources and gave the profits to the people.
|
|
|
07-02-2008, 03:58 AM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 1,835
|
To make matters worse, the American government is trying to hold off development of alternative energy source (most notably solar energy) indefinately.
|
|
|
07-03-2008, 01:07 AM
|
#4
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,587
|
Thats really bothering. In Ireland and the UK both governments are building massive off-shore wind farms which will provide 20% of the nations power by 2020. Its 100% clean and never ending.
Scotland is building wave powered generators to provide power. Iceland as of 2007 has 100% of its power provided from green renewable sources - mostly wave, mixed with solar and wind. Thats a whole country the size of many American states with a population also the equal to that of many states that is 100% green and not using ANY fossil fuels to power their homes or businesses. Yet, you never hear anyone in America talk about this accomplishment.
With all that desert out in Nevada and New Mexico, you would think America would build massive solar/wind farms and be able to provide all the power they need, infinitely, without any issue, yet they have yet to really create such industries. I know there are a few, but the reality is that 99% of the land that is perfect for that is just sitting unused and undeveloped while companies fight for oil rights.
If one billionaire moved in an bought up all the desert land to create such a project, well, he would probably be able to match Bill Gates in bank figures a few years down the road.
|
|
|
07-03-2008, 10:19 AM
|
#5
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 95
|
Well there IS the various dams America uses. The problem is, it doesn't get proper coverage, these alternative sources of power.
For example, show an American that they can have a purely water powered or hydrogen powered pick up truck or SUV with no threat to performance, and you'll see a more environmentally conscious America. At least with the people.
|
|
|
07-03-2008, 06:04 PM
|
#6
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,419
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CptSternn
Thats really bothering. In Ireland and the UK both governments are building massive off-shore wind farms which will provide 20% of the nations power by 2020. Its 100% clean and never ending.
|
Though thats just a promise from the government at the moment isn't it?
Iceland mainly uses hydroelectric and geothermal power, but its definatley in head for using green electricity production. Plus many houses are geothermally heated I believe.
The taking Iraqi oil was always gonna happen *sigh*
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:47 AM.
|
 |