 |

|
 |
| TV, Movies, & Games Talk about your favorite TV shows, movies, games, and other media here. Or don't. We don't want to tell you what to do or anything. |
06-01-2009, 05:07 PM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Harlem
Posts: 6,909
|
[MOVIE] Anansi Boys as a movie and why Amrerican Gods wont happen
http://splashpage.mtv.com/2008/11/17...s-wont-happen/
Mother fuck... Showtime needs to do something about American Gods. It's far too brilliant.
__________________
No Gods. No Kings.
Not all beliefs and ideas are equal.
|
|
|
06-01-2009, 06:54 PM
|
#2
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gallifrey
Posts: 2,817
|
I say yea on American Gods as a miniseries.
|
|
|
06-02-2009, 05:04 AM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 1,472
|
It it happened at all, it would have to be a miniseries, but part of me just wants American Gods to be left alone.
__________________
The Beginner's Quick Guide to Goth: 1 2 3 4 5
"Now some of you may encounter the devil's bargain if you get that far. Any old soul is worth saving at least to a priest, but not every soul is worth buying. So you can take the offer as a compliment."
-William S. Burroughs
You're not entitled to your opinion.
|
|
|
06-02-2009, 09:50 AM
|
#4
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sugar Hill
Posts: 3,887
|
If it's done right, American Gods would be amazing. The problem is that a miniseries won't have the budget of a movie, and at the same time, for it to be a movie, the story would have to be seriously condensed.
American Gods is a sprawling epic. It wouldn't work as a single two hour movie, and would probably be too short for a trilogy. Also, there's really no place to break it into two movies.
Honestly, I'd just leave it as a book.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KontanKarite
I promote radical change through my actions.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Lahnger
I have chugged more than ten epic boners.
|
|
|
|
06-07-2009, 03:11 PM
|
#5
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by viscus
It it happened at all, it would have to be a miniseries, but part of me just wants American Gods to be left alone.
|
Agreed. The "Stardust" movie already made me cringe...
|
|
|
06-07-2009, 04:38 PM
|
#6
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Back in Wisconsin(thinking about invading the south)
Posts: 3,693
|
Eh I don't really like Anansi Boys that much, it's the whole mistaken identity/steal your girlfriend thing that I hate when I see it in books and movies, I had to stop reading the moment that brother stole his gf's virginity.
__________________
"The chaos of the world viewed from a distance reveals perfection."- me
"Never overestimate the intellect of someone so foolish that they would exploit and perpetuate stupidity in the people around them, for they create their own damnation as they tear out and sell the pillars that support society as a whole, bringing it crashing down upon them."-me
“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”- Einstein
|
|
|
06-08-2009, 05:22 AM
|
#7
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 1,472
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mauritia Mayer
Agreed. The "Stardust" movie already made me cringe...
|
I really liked the Stardust movie. It wasn't great, but it was still quite enjoyable.
__________________
The Beginner's Quick Guide to Goth: 1 2 3 4 5
"Now some of you may encounter the devil's bargain if you get that far. Any old soul is worth saving at least to a priest, but not every soul is worth buying. So you can take the offer as a compliment."
-William S. Burroughs
You're not entitled to your opinion.
|
|
|
06-08-2009, 10:45 AM
|
#8
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sugar Hill
Posts: 3,887
|
I thought Stardust was great. In my opinion it's one of the few movies that is actually better than the book. I usually use it as an example of a movie which makes minor changes to the plot to allow it to work as a film, but still stays true to the soul of the movie. Tristan was also much more complex and likeable in the movie as opposed to the book, and the plot with the witches actually came to a climax instead of an anti-climax.
I appreciate what Gaiman was trying to do with the novel version of Stardust, but quite frankly there's a reason we don't write stories structured like fairy tales anymore: In a classic fairy tale the characters are usually hollow and the plot is usually insane and rambling. The screenplay managed to make all of the characters more complex, it seriously condensed the plot, and the story actually had an ending instead of just limping off and dying somewhere.
Plus Robert Deniro was awesome.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KontanKarite
I promote radical change through my actions.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Lahnger
I have chugged more than ten epic boners.
|
|
|
|
06-08-2009, 12:49 PM
|
#9
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Despanan
I thought Stardust was great. In my opinion it's one of the few movies that is actually better than the book. I usually use it as an example of a movie which makes minor changes to the plot to allow it to work as a film, but still stays true to the soul of the movie. Tristan was also much more complex and likeable in the movie as opposed to the book, and the plot with the witches actually came to a climax instead of an anti-climax.
I appreciate what Gaiman was trying to do with the novel version of Stardust, but quite frankly there's a reason we don't write stories structured like fairy tales anymore: In a classic fairy tale the characters are usually hollow and the plot is usually insane and rambling. The screenplay managed to make all of the characters more complex, it seriously condensed the plot, and the story actually had an ending instead of just limping off and dying somewhere.
Plus Robert Deniro was awesome.
|
My main gripe with the Stardust movie was the ending, actually. I liked how the novel had the sad, lonely star ending the novel. It gave the novel a sense of irony - since he saved her life, but she ended up living forever and being lonely - that the movie didn't have with the big happily-ever-after ending.
The Robert Deniro part confused me, actually. I felt it was kind of silly and unnecessary.
It wasn't a bad movie by any means, it just didn't really live up to my expectations - but I really enjoyed the novel as is, so I didn't think the story needed improving.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:28 PM.
|
 |