 |
|
 |
| TV, Movies, & Games Talk about your favorite TV shows, movies, games, and other media here. Or don't. We don't want to tell you what to do or anything. |
11-03-2005, 06:09 AM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 43
|
Which is better Saw 1 or 2
Which is better Saw 1 or 2] :-?
|
|
|
|
11-03-2005, 02:09 PM
|
#2
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: a lonely place...
Posts: 953
|
saw 2 isnt out yet
but saw 1 will be better because the rights were brought by yanks and no offence they will probably screw it up.
only the aussies are twisted enough to pull of a sequal.
did you know one of the origional writters was the host of a childrens t.v program.
LOL
thats what kids t.v does to you......
__________________
"the man who won an award for taking the most drugs ever consumed by a human has died. he was attacked by a pack of wolves....he thought he saw."
*another eliter*
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2005, 04:42 PM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,761
|
Go the aussies! (Just felt like saying that!)
In relation to the movie, 'The Saw' pulls a wicked twisted plot. But, its one of those movies that I would only watch once.
__________________
"Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months." Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2005, 04:46 PM
|
#4
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UnderYourBed
Posts: 11
|
No I Hate It
I Mean There Was No Really Action In It
Even Its Not To The End Of The Road
Even It Was Not Tarifing At All
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2005, 07:17 PM
|
#5
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 2
|
Saw II was far too predictable, and none of the characters were really worth saving. I wanted them all to die, including Donnie Wahlberg's son. Saw creeped me out, made my spine tingle, and I had to turn away during a couple of scenes. Saw II was pretty much an attempt to recapture some of the creepiness, but instead ended up focusing on the gore. Lame.
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2005, 07:14 AM
|
#6
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: a lonely place...
Posts: 953
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LordOfDevils
No I Hate It
I Mean There Was No Really Action In It
Even Its Not To The End Of The Road
Even It Was Not Tarifing At All
|
DICKHEAD!!!!!!!!
it wasn't an action movie it was a horror/thiller movie.
go away and think about what you are saying.
__________________
"the man who won an award for taking the most drugs ever consumed by a human has died. he was attacked by a pack of wolves....he thought he saw."
*another eliter*
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2005, 09:42 PM
|
#7
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Netherworld between yo momma's legs.
Posts: 2,020
|
I thought Saw was okay...Not something I'll watch over and over, There were some parts that scared me (Especially that retarded puppet thing...eeeww)
But I haven't seen the sequel.
__________________
OWNED BY BJORK_FREAK
Hier sind doch irgendwo kinder versteckt
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2005, 11:00 PM
|
#8
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: East Bay CA
Posts: 70
|
I saw the sequel to Saw, and it's pretty interesting. I thought it was going to suck,
but it didn't. I give it an 8 out of 10. I really liked the plot. It had some pretty disgusting scenes...
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2005, 11:08 PM
|
#9
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 45
|
I thought Saw was boring... nor did it freak me out in anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2005, 07:27 PM
|
#10
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 27
|
I seen Saw 2 on Halloween, in my opinion, part 1 was better. I can promise you that after seeing part 2, Saw will be a trilogy.
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2005, 06:21 PM
|
#11
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Between Madness and Delirium
Posts: 183
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fried Mullet
I seen Saw 2 on Halloween, in my opinion, part 1 was better. I can promise you that after seeing part 2, Saw will be a trilogy.
|
Yes, it more than likely will cause as we all know, when somethings good and makes money it will more than likely be milked for all its worth. Plus, the ending pretty much leaves the opening for it.
Now as for which is better, i'd have to say the first part was far superior in all aspects, mostly because it played out so well and was one of those psychological thriller movies that just seems to grasp the viewer, well most viewers anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2005, 08:42 PM
|
#12
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
I'd have to say Saw 3
__________________
"You had a tough day at the office, so you come home, make yourself some dinner, smother your kids, pop in a movie; maybe a have a drink. It's fun, right? ...wrong.
...don't smother your kids."
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 06:35 AM
|
#13
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Latvia
Posts: 1
|
Saw I was better, becose, I`ll agree with MilakoJackie, that Saw II was too focused on gore...
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 12:50 PM
|
#14
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,387
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Disfunction
I'd have to say Saw 3
|
Agreed....
Frickin' 9 dollars to see a crappy movie in a crappy uncomfortable chair, no thanks. I might rent it. The only good thing about the first movie was the amazing ending. The rest was crap.
__________________
"And if you didn't get all that, here's a short synopsis. I FUCKING DON'T LIKE YOU, CUNT."
--Geisha
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 02:43 PM
|
#15
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 408
|
How's about "both movies sucked"? Actually, I'd go so far as to call "Saw" the worst piece of shit I have ever seen in my entire life. (And if you know my tastes, that's saying quite a bit). Not even "so bad it's awesome" (such as "Manos-The Hands Of Fate") or "so bad it's transcendent ("Blood Feast" 1 and 2), but, literally.....stupid exploitation that doesn't even know how to BE an exploitation film (see "The Candy Snatchers", "Toolbox Murders".....oh hell, I should start an "Eploitation 101" thread, huh?), but is just a cynical money-making turd that has NO redeeming qualities whatsoever.....I mean HELL, fucking "SHOWGIRLS" has more going for it than either "Saw"!!!!!
__________________
I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out.
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 04:03 PM
|
#16
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,761
|
The Saw isn't meant to be a 'fine' film. Its just a movie you would watch for entertainment value? Whether that be watching at home with your friends or whatever.
I wouldn't say 'The Saw' is as bad as you labelled it to be. Its an okay movie, a typical Hollywood movie, in which hopefully the 'general public' can enjoy!
__________________
"Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months." Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 04:14 PM
|
#17
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 408
|
I wasn't expecting "Berlin Alexanderplatz". But the problem with "Saw" is that it's too stupid to even be a DECENT fucking exploitaion flick. It's all "oh look, we're going to follow every formula of the explo genre, but do it all half-heartedly and without a care about....well, anything that goes into this film, because the people who are going to see it are too fucking stupid to deserve their money anyways". And holy shit, I NEVER thought Danny Glover would ever be a bad actor, but this was definately his "I want a yacht" film.
Now, I happen to love a whole bunch of exploitation flicks of all kinds (and trust me, there are many many kinds), but the "Saw" lack the one thing that makes even the worst of the Christploitation flicks worth watching-entertainment value. And to be honest, the more people I meet who think "Saw" was friggin' amazing, the more I tend to agree with the makers of the film-these people ARE too fucking stupid to deserve their money.
Don't mean to sound snobbish, but fuck me if it ain't true.
__________________
I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:13 AM.
|
|
