Quote:
Originally Posted by Mir
I agree that the basic philosophy mirrors that of existentialism but with the added twist of being concerned for the welfare and well being of others. Trying to make it a better place for all to live in. It is this that draws me to it. Unfortunately, most existentialists I've talked to come across as pompous, self obsessed assholes. No offense intended and yes, I know that not everyone is the same.
|
I suppose that's very possible. It depends what kind of existentialism you're looking at, truly. The most common type these days is inspired by French philosophers, especially Jean-Paul Sartre. It's the idea that you are your own person, you create the meaning of your life, but on the flip-side, you are responsible for everything that you do. It sounds simple enough, but it can get rather complicated when you begin to talk about God, and things that you can
not change about yourself (for instance Age, Sex [to some extent], Race, etc.)
Most types of existentialism hold these same ideas, in fact, all of them do. It's just that some people claiming 'existentialist' happen to be rather selfish and hedonistic. I see that many Nietzschean Existentialists seems to be more like this, but it really can piss me off sometimes. Nietzsche advocated free will, power, and pride, but unlike many people like to believe, he was not a Nationalist. To me, he means something other than big-headed pride with mindless infatuation with one's self. It's more about having the pride in yourself to be able to think for yourself.
But all that I've said aside, my main thing that I would like to get across is that everybody is different (obviously), but more that Existentialism as a whole can be a greatly misunderstood philosophy, and at times is completely bastardized.