Fetishes and Sexual Quirks (X-rated)

[Apathy's_Child]

Originally Posted by lonelygirl17

Alright. I admit it. I am a closet pervert. I like to masturbate and even though I'm straight, I'm turned on by lesbian sex. There. I said it. I feel dirty now. Good-bye now.

Masturbating isn't perverted! Unless you do it some weird-ass way...... if you wanted to film it and send me the tape, I'd be happy to check.

[Rae Ven Rae]

hey -- I like lesbian sex too!

[Mistress Lilith]

I like threesomes, but only if I get to be the dom. Basically my only rule is that I give the orders and you obey them.

[raggedyanne]

threesomes are hot. I'm pretty much the only girl in my group, so I get some offers. lol. Masturbating is hot. Plus, howz your partner going to know what you like unless you know.

[Mistress Lilith]

Originally Posted by raggedyanne

Masturbating is hot. Plus, howz your partner going to know what you like unless you know.

Exactly, that way you don't have to have awkward sex until you figure out what you like.

[thedoll]

I cannot climax when I maturbate, then I just feel like a failure. My partner knows what I want, but I don't

[Apathy's_Child]

Originally Posted by thedoll

I cannot climax when I maturbate, then I just feel like a failure. My partner knows what I want, but I don't

Do you have a vibrator? My gf has trouble coming without one.

[Rae Ven Rae]

I like role playing -- either in reality or in my mind during sex--

[Mistress Lilith]

Rolepay is amazing. I know it's waaay overdone but I really like the whole schoolgirl thing. I went to Catholic school as a kid and I hacked up some of my old uniforms for costumes.

[Anomander]

Heh heh. I like women over 30, and curvy. Slim doesn't work for me. I like netting, and I LOVE group sex. I enjoy shagging while watching other people.

[LadyLucretia]

Originally Posted by Metabolik

I forgot o_O I presume it was a joke...
and Bleed you can tie me up if you like...i'm a secret agent so I can get out super easy...also I like it when I don't have to do fuck all...i'm looking forward to becoming 16 ...2 years to go

Both of you are underage. Would you want your parents reading this? Your teachers? No? Then I suggest not writing about it on a public forum.

Also it creeps me out to think about children having sex. So if only for the comfort of those of us who don't like kiddy porn, please stop.

[Breathless Horror]

Originally Posted by LadyLucretia

Both of you are underage.

They are underage for the United States, yes. Metabolik is from England, he might be over the age of consent in his country. I wouldn't really know, as I'm not familliar with British law, so if I'm making an ass of myself I apologize. Here in Canada the age of consent is 14

[LadyLucretia]

Originally Posted by Breathless Horror

They are underage for the United States, yes. Metabolik is from England, he might be over the age of consent in his country. I wouldn't really know, as I'm not familliar with British law, so if I'm making an ass of myself I apologize. Here in Canada the age of consent is 14

Eek, 14, really? If you are 14 you can have sex with a 75 year old and it is legal and socially acceptable? As someone with a background in psychology I can say with surety that 99% of 14 year olds are not mature enough to have sex. Hell, many 14 year olds aren't even sexually mature yet and are technically still children.

Either way, most teenagers are still children in my book, and I don't need those images in my head. And I still don't think their parents and teachers would approve.

[Breathless Horror]

I think there's a cap on it. Something like if you are under the age of 18, you can only have sex with someone that is also under 18. If a 14 year old was to have sex with, say, a 25 year old, then the 25 year old could be charged with statuatory (sp?) ****. And while it is legal, it's not necassarilly socially acceptable.

[LadyLucretia]

Originally Posted by Breathless Horror

I think there's a cap on it. Something like if you are under the age of 18, you can only have sex with someone that is also under 18. If a 14 year old was to have sex with, say, a 25 year old, then the 25 year old could be charged with statuatory (sp?) ****. And while it is legal, it's not necassarilly socially acceptable.

Whether or not the act is legal, it would still be kiddy pr0n if someone videotaped it and sold it. I.E. I still don't want to think about it .

[Apathy's_Child]

Originally Posted by LadyLucretia

As someone with a background in psychology I can say with surety that 99% of 14 year olds are not mature enough to have sex. Hell, many 14 year olds aren't even sexually mature yet and are technically still children.

What's sexually mature? The fact that you've started your period or can get a hard-on? If that's the criteria, I think that the vast majority of THIRTEEN year olds are sexually mature.

What's ready? Ready to deal with pregnancy? Shit, most of the people I know who've had kids weren't ready. I'm not saying kids are equipped to deal with parenthood, just that I don't think a sixteen year old is much more ready, nor an eighteen year old for that matter. Too young is too young and unless you're either in your thirties or REAL mature for your age, most people having kids probably aren't "ready". That's not to say young parents can't do a great job, just that "ready" strikes me as kind of an empty term. Ready to deal with STDs? NO ONE is "ready" for that. Old enough to tie your own damn shoes is old enough to understand the concept of contraception, if it's explained to you properly.

Also, I don't see why having studied psychology makes you qualified to talk about 99% of teens like you've interviewed them all personally.

I'm not getting on your back, it's just that I don't we think we give kids enough credit these days. Young doesn't necessarily equal naive, especially these days. I lost mine at fourteen and not only did it do me no harm, physically or psychologically, but I understood and used contraception. I don't see that those 2-4 years (depending on country / state) make a great deal of difference.

This should get its own thread - how young is too young?........

Originally Posted by LadyLucretia

Whether or not the act is legal, it would still be kiddy pr0n if someone videotaped it and sold it. I.E. I still don't want to think about it .

Who said anything about taping it?....... All sex is potentially porn by that standard.

[LadyLucretia]

Originally Posted by Apathy's_Child

Also, I don't see why having studied psychology makes you qualified to talk about 99% of teens like you've interviewed them all personally.

I'm not getting on your back, it's just that I don't we think we give kids enough credit these days. Young doesn't necessarily equal naive, especially these days. I lost mine at fourteen and not only did it do me no harm, physically or psychologically, but I understood and used contraception. I don't see that those 2-4 years (depending on country / state) make a great deal of difference.

Do you have a child? If your 14 year old daughter wanted to have sex, you're saying you'd be fine with that?

Ack, I know that I'm not going to get a good response on a board mainly comprised of teenagers anyway. I've gotten a bit conservative on these issues as I've gotten older and seen just how immature and clueless most young teens are. I should stop reading this thread. I just keep thinking about how they would probably get grounded if their parents ever saw this, and that if you're young enough to get grounded you really shouldn't be having sex.

[Apathy's_Child]

Originally Posted by LadyLucretia

Do you have a child? If your 14 year old daughter wanted to have sex, you're saying you'd be fine with that?

I don't have a kid, I'm 19.

Maybe not, but if she was my daughter I wouldn't be in a position to be objective. I doubt many parents of 16 or 18 year old girls would beam with pride at the thought of their little baby at it like a rabbit on speed. Parents don't like the thought of their kids, especially their girl kids, having sex, the same way kids don't like to picture their parents screwing. It's natural. I think that from an anthropological POV it might be a built in reflex to stop incestual attractions and thereby create a stronger race, but that's just conjecture on my part and not really relevant anyway.

But I would like to think that if I found out my 14 yr old was having sex, I'd be cool enough to make sure she understood the necessary precautions than lock her in her room till her 21st birthday and go beat up the boy she was having it with.

[Underwater Ophelia]

Originally Posted by LadyLucretia

Ack, I know that I'm not going to get a good response on a board mainly comprised of teenagers anyway.

Why would you be reading a thread about sex on a "board mainly comprised of teenagers?" Do you want to read about the sex lives of teenagers?

Anyway, if you want to communicate with people your own age, that's fine, and there are many places to do it.

However, like you said, this board is mostly occupied by teenagers, so if you're ready to give up your bullshit ageist attitude and treat teenagers with respect, then stay here.

[LadyLucretia]

Originally Posted by Underwater Ophelia

so if you're ready to give up your bullshit ageist attitude and treat teenagers with respect, then stay here.

So if saying 14 is too young for sex is ageist, then are you saying that 14 year olds should be given drivers licenses, marriage licenses, be allowed to buy cigarettes and tattoo their faces, star in a porn flick, and serve in the military? Or are those restrictions "ageist" too? In most states the age of consent is at least 16. If you care that much about "ageism" then write your senator.

I do respect teenagers who earn that respect, the same rule I apply to adults. It is stupid for anyone other than a sex worker to talk about their sex life in a public forum, where it can be preserved indefinitely and be available to teachers, parents, college admission boards, future employers, etc. It's not smart to do at *any* age in my opinion, but *particularly* if the persons in question are underage.

[Apathy's_Child]

I think it was more the part about how "immature and clueless most young teens are." That irked me a little too to be honest, but I guess you're entitled to your opinion.

Also I don't think that being in the military or tatooing your face is really comparable to having sex. Sounds a little like clutching at straws.

How are future employers, teachers or college admissions boards supposed to know which posts are theirs? You don't register with your real name here.

[LadyLucretia]

Originally Posted by Apathy's_Child

I think it was more the part about how "immature and clueless most young teens are." That irked me a little too to be honest, but I guess you're entitled to your opinion.

Also I don't think that being in the military or tatooing your face is really comparable to having sex. Sounds a little like clutching at straws.

How are future employers, teachers or college admissions boards supposed to know which posts are theirs? You don't register with your real name here.

Well, I count myself as formerly being immature and clueless as a teenager. That statement is born of personal experience (and I was always considered 'mature for my age')

Sex is a decision that can have permanent consequences. Is contracting HIV that much different from being a disabled veteran? Is having a child a bigger or smaller deal than a facial tattoo? I would say they are all weighty decisions, which is why there are age restrictions on them.

And don't underestimate employers. Let's say your myspace username is the same as the one you use here (like mine is). On myspace many people allow themselves to be searched for by first and last name. If any employer/teacher/etc. finds your username on myspace and then googles it, it will likely lead them here. Or if you have a blog that lists your full name as well as a username, they could do it that way too. Maybe a teacher wouldn't put in that effort, but a concerned parent would, and more and more employers are doing so.

[Underwater Ophelia]

Originally Posted by LadyLucretia

So if saying 14 is too young for sex is ageist, then are you saying that 14 year olds should be given drivers licenses, marriage licenses, be allowed to buy cigarettes and tattoo their faces, star in a porn flick, and serve in the military? Or are those restrictions "ageist" too? In most states the age of consent is at least 16. If you care that much about "ageism" then write your senator.

I do respect teenagers who earn that respect, the same rule I apply to adults. It is stupid for anyone other than a sex worker to talk about their sex life in a public forum, where it can be preserved indefinitely and be available to teachers, parents, college admission boards, future employers, etc. It's not smart to do at *any* age in my opinion, but *particularly* if the persons in question are underage.

My post was in response to the sentence I quoted. Nice try, though.

[Apathy's_Child]

Originally Posted by LadyLucretia

Well, I count myself as formerly being immature and clueless as a teenager. That statement is born of personal experience (and I was always considered 'mature for my age')

Right, but that's you. I actually think I was pretty clued-up about sex at 14 - no way I would have gone in without protection. I also think it's a sweeping generalization to base your judgment of a whole age group on memories of yourself at that age.

Originally Posted by LadyLucretia

Sex is a decision that can have permanent consequences. Is contracting HIV that much different from being a disabled veteran? Is having a child a bigger or smaller deal than a facial tattoo? I would say they are all weighty decisions, which is why there are age restrictions on them.

The odds of dying as a soldier are far higher than those of contracting a life-threatening disease, if you take the proper precautions. If you don't know what they are then yes, you are too immature, but since you start Sex Ed way before it's likely you'll be having sex I think most teens are aware of this. Plenty of people over the age of consent have unprotected sex. Poor judgment can occur at any age.

Of course having a baby is a bigger deal, but again if protection is used the risk is not related to age.

I understand the analogy, but don't think it stands up to closer analysis.

Originally Posted by LadyLucretia

And don't underestimate employers. Let's say your myspace username is the same as the one you use here (like mine is). On myspace many people allow themselves to be searched for by first and last name. If any employer/teacher/etc. finds your username on myspace and then googles it, it will likely lead them here. Or if you have a blog that lists your full name as well as a username, they could do it that way too. Maybe a teacher wouldn't put in that effort, but a concerned parent would, and more and more employers are doing so.

This is true, but I don't have a MySpace so I didn't think of it that way.

I don't think light flirting would bother me though, in the context of this thread. They didn't say they've actually done these things, just thought about them.

[james"bloody tears"]

ive been wachinging this conversation unfold and i have to throw in my two sense

me and my wife are young(18 and 19) and shes prego, while im not ready, im doing the responsible thing and stepping up.

my personail opinoin is, it depends on the person, some are just more mature then others and while i know checking on every teen isnt possible i think consent should be set so if your under age and give consent to another who is under age then it should be ok